Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Gender Equity


     The following articles are all connected through the theme of transformation as the nation industrializes in American education affecting higher education. These articles encompass the emphasis of gender in higher education and in promoting civic engagement in educating citizens for the needs of society and the nation. Through the reading of the articles, one comes to question current American society and must ask if America has truly become a pluralistic democracy.  Is higher education reaching its primary purpose to prepare students to participate in a diverse democracy while increasing student awareness of the value of diversity and civic engagement? 

Davison, K. G., & Nelson, B. G. (2011). Men and Teaching: Good Intentions and Productive Tensions. Journal of Men's Studies, 19(2), 91-96. doi:10.3149/jms.1902.91.
            
     The purpose of this study is to address the rarity of the presence of male teachers in education in the United States and the need requiring skilled and knowledgeable males to meet the needs for American secondary and higher education. The author further investigates gender education and implications, contradictions, and frustrations of male teachers.  The reason for writing the article is to explore how gender and teaching change the educational and social lives of students. Traditionally, the roles of a teacher or a professor in the United States during 1700 to mid-1800s were primarily men. The study concludes that as the gendered expectations changed, the issue of men and teaching also shifted. Throughout most of the 1800s and 1900s, women were thought to be of stronger moral character than men, thus a better influence and teacher. Furthermore, the article suggests that the lack of male teachers has left education without the proper tools to address boys and young men as well as young women and the need to see masculinity modeled by male teachers. This had great implications on society because the emphases on the pursuit of higher learning through a feminist or profeminist dialectical thinking form many contradictions surrounding men and teaching. The aforementioned issue coincides with the text because gender, especially feminism, continues to affect higher education.  In order to meet the need of society in the early 1900s, the woman suffrage movement began with female students in higher education as well as female faculty members raising the populist call for gender implicit education. Moreover, higher educators as well society need to understand that currently, a combination of gender perspectives in higher education is necessary for the greater understanding and possibility for change. Neither one nor the other gender owns a correct prospective, rather for student learning, a combination of the gender perspectives with one's own will allow more introspection and perception.

Paul D. Umbach, et al. "Why Do More Women than Men Want to Earn a Four-Year Degree? Exploring the Effects of Gender, Social Origin, and Social Capital on Educational Expectations." Journal of Higher Education 82.1 (2011): 1-32. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 7 Oct. 2011.
     
     The purpose of the article is to impart on the reader the importance of gender in education and its impact in the development of a democratic America. The article further informs that women have surpassed men in education expectations, when traditionally higher education was for young men. Furthermore, it is projected that the current gender gap will continue. The reason behind the article is to educate about the student educational expectations and their correlation to predictors of future educational attainment. The article suggests that all of the accomplishments a person receives is gained through educational expectations, social origin, and values. An individuals future position is established through interpersonal relationships as well as intrapersonal expectations instilled by parents.  The article concludes that females are more likely than men to earn a college degree because of the parental education, parental influences, societal expectations, and professional employment. The article is a phenomenal example of the way the woman suffrage movement influenced higher education in America. The movement was a means of allowing society, connected through higher education, to educate a new era of women. This has impacted America in a higher education democratic society not only by the amount of women graduating with graduate degrees, but by reinforcing the perspective that a higher education institution is supposed to level a developed democratic nation. This will further affect society because as history has shown that when a specific gender lacks education it is a time to regroup and intrigue that gender to further education, thus allowing a multitude of gender perspectives.

Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2010). Where the Guys Are: Males in Higher Education. Change, 42(3), 29-                                                                                      
             35. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

     The purpose of the article is to explore the current gender education practices in higher education regarding admission into colleges and universities in America. The author considers the history of US colleges and universities regarding discrimination against women and affirmative action. Furthermore, the article concentrates on current practices and trends regarding the admission of women into higher education institutions by rejecting their application on the grounds of affirmative action because men have become the minority in higher education. Moreover, the article suggests that we have been so successful in improving female performances that we have made it harder for males to be successful in colleges and universities. It is suggested that women are more successful in undergraduate and graduate school, whereas men only exceed women at the doctoral level, though that gap is rapidly dwindling. The reason the article was written was to expose the current obstacles to education that have prevented males from completing higher education. The article also suggests that a males join the workforce through manufacturing, manual labor, and service jobs as well as selective service such as the Army or other branches of the military more than females.  Furthermore, the article concludes that females do not have the workforce options that males have; therefore they have no alternative than to seek higher education for better prospects upon education. This will impact higher education as well as society because employability will be a concern especially for social stability. Furthermore, if a university or college historically was created to impact the intellectual and civic development of individuals and males are no longer attending, then a social cohesion will no longer exist and perhaps gender inequality will continue, yet be reversed. The article further advocates that education has had for several years increased the education of women, but the new minority in higher education institutions are males and their education needs to be better served without rolling back important gains for women. Education needs to be equal for all genders.
    
     Gender bias in education is grossly overstated.  The notion that males are somewhat nurtured to be better students than females is ill perceived.  The data from Kleinfeld indicated that there was no real significance in standardized test scores on writing, language, reading, geopolitical, and study skills of both male and female students.  Females actually had a very small advantage on all of the aforementioned tests.  The only exception of in which males had a slight improvement was in the area of geopolitics. (Kleinfeld, 1998 )
     With respect to grades females college students, Kleinfeld also stated that females are outperforming males in all college majors even science and math, in this field of study females had a GPA of 3.18 to the male GPA of 2.98.
Academically, I do not believe that this is an issue; however as a professional a definite difference is present regarding pay.  Coaches of males sports in the district I belong are paid more than coaches of females sports, regardless of the coaches gender, though both team coaches work the same amount of practices, games, and tournaments.  This has been in litigation for several years now with Title IX being the forefront of the cry.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment