Thursday, April 18, 2013

Hidden Curriculum


According to the United States Department of State the definition of democracy is: to promote fundamental American values as religious freedom and worker rights, but also help create a more, secure, stable, and prosperous global arena in which the United States can advance its national interest.  The aforementioned definition does not speak of bias, prejudice, or installing one’s personal beliefs of personal conviction towards others, yet some educators make it a point to do so.
Hidden curriculum in an educational setting is somewhat prevalent, but not the educational norm.  It is natural for an educator to give hints to his/hers lifestyle preferences, religious affiliations, or political association.  I for one do not have a problem with an educator sharing certain views in the classroom setting. However, I do have a problem with educators who steer their students toward a certain area of debate or concern and impart their distinct philosophies upon them.  I for one have been a part of such biased viewpoints as a student in high school and college.  I resented teachers for trying to instill personal political viewpoints and racial bigotry.  At the present time I have a colleague who makes derogatory jokes regarding Muslims, and how they are all terrorists. I sometimes wonder if these same radical biased viewpoints are introduced and embedded into his students. 
Charles Eliot in many ways practiced and advocated for cultural hegemony with his ideology of keeping immigrants, Native Americans, and African Americans in the lower echelon of the social  class and depriving them the same education as “pure American stock” Anglo Americans. Eliot went on to say, “Frankly referring to blacks as savage which must learn the lessons of the six-day workweek and vigilant frugality before they could be accorded political and economic parity with whites.” 
In my opinion educators need to educate each student to their fullest and let them make their own choices with respects to entering college, technical school, the military, or the labor market.  The educational era of the Educational Sorting Machine of the 1940’s and 50’s are over. Students are now privileged to not only choose their own occupational future, but are also fortunate to create their own opinions towards topics and debates.
Education and democracy are entangled in America.  Democracy can be strengthened, weakened, or even disappear, but the fundamental ideas must remain in society in order for a true democracy to exist.  As educators we must always stay unbiased as possible and never force our personal philosophies upon our students.  We must introduce ideas so that they can learn and make their imprint as American citizens.  If educators fail to do so they not only fail the democratic system of public education, but introduce the failed principles of communism and social democracy.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

School Reform





     The last major school reform happened with the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act.   This act not only expanded the federal role in public education, but also put a greater emphasis on disadvantaged children.   This landmark act, criticized by teachers, teacher unions, and local school board members around the country was nevertheless adopted.   The end results of NCLB are mixed.  The Journal of Policy Analysis indicated that, NCLB generated statistically significant increases in the average math performance of 4th graders as well as improvements at the lower and top percentiles. There is also evidence of improvements in 8th grade math achievement, particularly among traditionally low-achieving groups and at the lower percentiles. However, there was no evidence that NCLB increased reading achievement in either 4th or 8th grade.

     I have mixed feelings regarding the policies that were forced upon school districts and teachers because of  the implementation of NCLB.  Yes, the end effects of the test data held schools accountable, but the mixed data and flawed system of helping low performing schools while penalizing top performing schools is not sustainable for the long term goals of public education.  Educational historian and National Education Associate honorary recipient Diane Ravitch said it best when he stated, “By the last count, about half the schools in the U.S. are now labeled to be “failing schools.” The number will rise with every year as we get closer to 2014, because it is an impossible goal. No state has 100 percent proficiency; no country in the world has 100 percent proficiency.”  (Hudson, 2012)
     The implementation of NCLB is an example of federal level politicians devising a universal educational paradigm for the masses, while bypassing the true stakeholders of public education. 
     For far too long, politicians have made decisions for and about education without asking or listening to the input of educators.  It is time that educators take back their profession and start making the decisions that they know to be best for education and students.  You wouldn’t take a dance teacher from his/ her classroom to run a fortune 500 company with no experience in business, so why do educators allow the education system to be conducted in a similar fashion?  Education needs a change in order to have a positive shift into the future.
     The David School operates on an entirely different set up policies and guidelines that a traditional public school setting. The stakeholders of this educational institution are set primarily around its students, teachers, and community members.   This school bypasses state and federal educational guidelines.  This school is founded on Christian values and works at giving its students real life skills which helps them compete in the labor market.  The David Schools principle vision is stated on sustainable employment for all of its students.   This school’s mission and philosophy is more closely aligned to a technical school than a public school way of thinking.  



                                                            References


Hudson, J. (2012, January 21). Ravitch: 'No CHild Left Behind has been a disaster'. The Davis Enterprise, p. 4.

Published: Thomas S. Dee & Brian Jacob, 2011. "The impact of no Child Left Behind on student    achievement," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 418-446, Summer.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Gender Equity


     The following articles are all connected through the theme of transformation as the nation industrializes in American education affecting higher education. These articles encompass the emphasis of gender in higher education and in promoting civic engagement in educating citizens for the needs of society and the nation. Through the reading of the articles, one comes to question current American society and must ask if America has truly become a pluralistic democracy.  Is higher education reaching its primary purpose to prepare students to participate in a diverse democracy while increasing student awareness of the value of diversity and civic engagement? 

Davison, K. G., & Nelson, B. G. (2011). Men and Teaching: Good Intentions and Productive Tensions. Journal of Men's Studies, 19(2), 91-96. doi:10.3149/jms.1902.91.
            
     The purpose of this study is to address the rarity of the presence of male teachers in education in the United States and the need requiring skilled and knowledgeable males to meet the needs for American secondary and higher education. The author further investigates gender education and implications, contradictions, and frustrations of male teachers.  The reason for writing the article is to explore how gender and teaching change the educational and social lives of students. Traditionally, the roles of a teacher or a professor in the United States during 1700 to mid-1800s were primarily men. The study concludes that as the gendered expectations changed, the issue of men and teaching also shifted. Throughout most of the 1800s and 1900s, women were thought to be of stronger moral character than men, thus a better influence and teacher. Furthermore, the article suggests that the lack of male teachers has left education without the proper tools to address boys and young men as well as young women and the need to see masculinity modeled by male teachers. This had great implications on society because the emphases on the pursuit of higher learning through a feminist or profeminist dialectical thinking form many contradictions surrounding men and teaching. The aforementioned issue coincides with the text because gender, especially feminism, continues to affect higher education.  In order to meet the need of society in the early 1900s, the woman suffrage movement began with female students in higher education as well as female faculty members raising the populist call for gender implicit education. Moreover, higher educators as well society need to understand that currently, a combination of gender perspectives in higher education is necessary for the greater understanding and possibility for change. Neither one nor the other gender owns a correct prospective, rather for student learning, a combination of the gender perspectives with one's own will allow more introspection and perception.

Paul D. Umbach, et al. "Why Do More Women than Men Want to Earn a Four-Year Degree? Exploring the Effects of Gender, Social Origin, and Social Capital on Educational Expectations." Journal of Higher Education 82.1 (2011): 1-32. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 7 Oct. 2011.
     
     The purpose of the article is to impart on the reader the importance of gender in education and its impact in the development of a democratic America. The article further informs that women have surpassed men in education expectations, when traditionally higher education was for young men. Furthermore, it is projected that the current gender gap will continue. The reason behind the article is to educate about the student educational expectations and their correlation to predictors of future educational attainment. The article suggests that all of the accomplishments a person receives is gained through educational expectations, social origin, and values. An individuals future position is established through interpersonal relationships as well as intrapersonal expectations instilled by parents.  The article concludes that females are more likely than men to earn a college degree because of the parental education, parental influences, societal expectations, and professional employment. The article is a phenomenal example of the way the woman suffrage movement influenced higher education in America. The movement was a means of allowing society, connected through higher education, to educate a new era of women. This has impacted America in a higher education democratic society not only by the amount of women graduating with graduate degrees, but by reinforcing the perspective that a higher education institution is supposed to level a developed democratic nation. This will further affect society because as history has shown that when a specific gender lacks education it is a time to regroup and intrigue that gender to further education, thus allowing a multitude of gender perspectives.

Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2010). Where the Guys Are: Males in Higher Education. Change, 42(3), 29-                                                                                      
             35. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

     The purpose of the article is to explore the current gender education practices in higher education regarding admission into colleges and universities in America. The author considers the history of US colleges and universities regarding discrimination against women and affirmative action. Furthermore, the article concentrates on current practices and trends regarding the admission of women into higher education institutions by rejecting their application on the grounds of affirmative action because men have become the minority in higher education. Moreover, the article suggests that we have been so successful in improving female performances that we have made it harder for males to be successful in colleges and universities. It is suggested that women are more successful in undergraduate and graduate school, whereas men only exceed women at the doctoral level, though that gap is rapidly dwindling. The reason the article was written was to expose the current obstacles to education that have prevented males from completing higher education. The article also suggests that a males join the workforce through manufacturing, manual labor, and service jobs as well as selective service such as the Army or other branches of the military more than females.  Furthermore, the article concludes that females do not have the workforce options that males have; therefore they have no alternative than to seek higher education for better prospects upon education. This will impact higher education as well as society because employability will be a concern especially for social stability. Furthermore, if a university or college historically was created to impact the intellectual and civic development of individuals and males are no longer attending, then a social cohesion will no longer exist and perhaps gender inequality will continue, yet be reversed. The article further advocates that education has had for several years increased the education of women, but the new minority in higher education institutions are males and their education needs to be better served without rolling back important gains for women. Education needs to be equal for all genders.
    
     Gender bias in education is grossly overstated.  The notion that males are somewhat nurtured to be better students than females is ill perceived.  The data from Kleinfeld indicated that there was no real significance in standardized test scores on writing, language, reading, geopolitical, and study skills of both male and female students.  Females actually had a very small advantage on all of the aforementioned tests.  The only exception of in which males had a slight improvement was in the area of geopolitics. (Kleinfeld, 1998 )
     With respect to grades females college students, Kleinfeld also stated that females are outperforming males in all college majors even science and math, in this field of study females had a GPA of 3.18 to the male GPA of 2.98.
Academically, I do not believe that this is an issue; however as a professional a definite difference is present regarding pay.  Coaches of males sports in the district I belong are paid more than coaches of females sports, regardless of the coaches gender, though both team coaches work the same amount of practices, games, and tournaments.  This has been in litigation for several years now with Title IX being the forefront of the cry.